malaperle added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894#903594, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894#903552, @malaperle wrote: > > > I think he meant to have multiple sections in the hover, one C/C++ and one > > not. But we noticed you can have an array of MarkedString in Hover so it > > should be fine. > > > I totally misunderstood the question. Good to know it all works without > changing the LSP. > Just to make sure I got it right this time: the use-case is to, e.g., return > both a code snippet (having `"language": cpp`) and a documentation string > (without `language`) as a result of hover request? Exactly! Although the without-language part, maybe it'll be "scope" information first. Maybe documentation/comments in a second patch. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
