krytarowski added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39162#903190, @krytarowski wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39162#903186, @joerg wrote: > > > I think we should special case Darwin and Windows and fall-back to > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH for the rest. Can't remember if there is a UNIX-like > > platform left where it doesn't work. > > > SHLIB_PATH in HP/UX Hmm SHLIB_PATH has been marked as legacy and they probably switched to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. AIX might still ship with LIBPATH. I agree that adding defines for OS'es that are barely developed (especially closed-source) without LLVM developers might be accumulating unused code. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39162 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
