danalbert added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D38599#899196, @howard.hinnant wrote:
> Fwiw, I wrote this code. All of that "fallback" stuff was written to make > customer code that was incorrect, but working on OS X > -version-that-used-libsupc++ continue to work. I.e. to be a crutch for > incorrect code. It should all be removed if you no longer want to provide > such a crutch. Android may end up wanting to use it for the same reason. I've backed it out for now, but it may end up being something we need since a fair number of NDK users (majority, probably) use libsupc++ and that might be a point of pain in migrating to libc++abi. Other Linux distros may want it as well, so probably worth leaving the code around. https://reviews.llvm.org/D38599 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
