dcoughlin accepted this revision. dcoughlin added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
> But I also think it wouldn't be good to block this until ClanD indexing > reaching a mature state. I agree 100%. > All in all, we are willing to reuse as much of ClangD indexing as we can in > the future, but I think it is also more aligned with the LLVM Developer > Policy to have something working committed and do the development in the repo > rather than working separately on a fork. This sounds good to me. I just wanted to make sure that you were onboard with changing this index to use the common indexing infrastructure in the future. (Assuming it makes sense to do so, of course). https://reviews.llvm.org/D34512 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
