ahatanak accepted this revision. ahatanak added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I see. It looks like there is an ambiguity between 'new_anotation' and 'new_annotations' that can't be resolved in ActOnMemberAccessExpr because they have the same distance from 'new_annotation'. This doesn't happen if the full expression (new_annotation->Swap) is typo-corrected because 'new_anotation' will be the only valid choice in that case. I don't think there is a problem with creating CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr for ObjC property access, so this looks fine. https://reviews.llvm.org/D37322 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
