erichkeane created this revision. The two examples in the test would both cause a compiler assert when attempting to calculate the exception specifier for the default constructor for the template classes. The problem was that dependents of this function expect that Field->getInClassInitializer (including canThrow) is not nullptr. However, if the template's initializer has an error, exactly that situation happens.
This patch simply sets the field to be invalid. https://reviews.llvm.org/D37865 Files: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp test/SemaCXX/init-expr-crash.cpp Index: test/SemaCXX/init-expr-crash.cpp =================================================================== --- /dev/null +++ test/SemaCXX/init-expr-crash.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 + +// Test reproduces a pair of crashes that were caused by code attempting +// to materialize a default constructor's exception specifier. + +template <class T> struct A { + static T tab[]; + + const int M = UNDEFINED; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier}} + + int main() + { + A<char> a; + + return 0; + } +}; + +template <class T> struct B { + static T tab[]; + + // expected-error@+1 {{invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type}} + const int N = sizeof(B<char>::tab) / sizeof(char); + + int main() + { + B<char> b; + + return 0; + } +}; Index: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp +++ lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp @@ -12436,7 +12436,8 @@ assert(Pattern && "We must have set the Pattern!"); } - if (InstantiateInClassInitializer(Loc, Field, Pattern, + if (!Pattern->hasInClassInitializer() || + InstantiateInClassInitializer(Loc, Field, Pattern, getTemplateInstantiationArgs(Field))) { // Don't diagnose this again. Field->setInvalidDecl();
Index: test/SemaCXX/init-expr-crash.cpp =================================================================== --- /dev/null +++ test/SemaCXX/init-expr-crash.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 + +// Test reproduces a pair of crashes that were caused by code attempting +// to materialize a default constructor's exception specifier. + +template <class T> struct A { + static T tab[]; + + const int M = UNDEFINED; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier}} + + int main() + { + A<char> a; + + return 0; + } +}; + +template <class T> struct B { + static T tab[]; + + // expected-error@+1 {{invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type}} + const int N = sizeof(B<char>::tab) / sizeof(char); + + int main() + { + B<char> b; + + return 0; + } +}; Index: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp +++ lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp @@ -12436,7 +12436,8 @@ assert(Pattern && "We must have set the Pattern!"); } - if (InstantiateInClassInitializer(Loc, Field, Pattern, + if (!Pattern->hasInClassInitializer() || + InstantiateInClassInitializer(Loc, Field, Pattern, getTemplateInstantiationArgs(Field))) { // Don't diagnose this again. Field->setInvalidDecl();
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits