rnk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaStmtAsm.cpp:617
+ return;
+ } else if (Res->isRValue()) {
+ bool Enum = isa<clang::EnumType>(T) && Res->EvaluateAsRValue(Eval,
Context);
----------------
RKSimon wrote:
> (style) Split these instead of an if-elseif chain
LLVM suggests early returns:
https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-early-exits-and-continue-to-simplify-code
I don't particularly care here, up to you. I personally like to abuse the
ability of C++ to return void to write things like this and skip braces, but
maybe *I'm* too clever for my own good:
if (T->isFunctionType() || T->isDependentType())
return Info.setLabel(Res);
if (Res->isRValue()) {
if (isa<clang::EnumType>(T) && Res->EvaluateAsRValue(Eval, Context))
return Info.setEnum(Eval.Val.getInt().getSExtValue());
return Info.setLabel(Res);
}
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaStmtAsm.cpp:620
+ bool Enum = isa<clang::EnumType>(T) && Res->EvaluateAsRValue(Eval,
Context);
+ Enum ? Info.setEnum(Eval.Val.getInt().getSExtValue()) : Info.setLabel(Res);
+ return;
----------------
This conditional expression is a bit too cute, I'd rather use a regular if.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37413
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
