Anastasia added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36410#863409, @yaxunl wrote:
> LGTM as a temporary measure until we have a solution for properly emitting > blocks as enqueued kernel. Should I start discussion with Khronos on that? What would our preference be - implicitly `generic` AS for capture addresses? https://reviews.llvm.org/D36410 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
