bwendling wrote: As you see, there are a ton of new changes. I had Claude give a thorough going over of the code and I believe we've come up with something rather good. Claude did point out that there's the possibility of an issue with `CallBrInst` with an `"rm"` constraint. And yes that is true, but like I said I do want to do that in a separate commit and it will probably be okay anyway, as register pressure in the fast RA is less likely, given its significant memory usage.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/181973 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
