https://github.com/efriedma-quic commented:
This is fragile: it depends on CanDevirtualizeCall here matching the corresponding devirtualization code in EmitObjectDelete. I'd rather not have that implicit coupling. Maybe it makes sense to call emitVirtualObjectDelete() directly, instead of going through EmitObjectDelete()? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183741 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
