rjmccall added a comment. The only thing I would say here is that, as a platform vendor, I would like the ability to opt in to ABI fixes that aren't in my base-line version. In particular, we're generally more aggressive about taking C++ ABI fixes on Darwin when there's a strong argument that the impact is likely to be low, like for some of these indirect-ABI cases that only make a difference for classes with e.g. only deleted copy/move constructors but a trivial destructor.
Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D36501 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
