alexshap created this revision. Herald added a subscriber: xazax.hun. This diff attempts to fixe analyzer's crash (triggered assert) on the newly added test case. The assert being discussed is assert(!B.lookup(R, BindingKey::Direct)) in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp, however the root cause appears to be different. For classes with empty bases the offsets might be tricky. For example, let's assume we have
struct S: NonEmptyBase, EmptyBase { ... }; In this case Clang applies empty base class optimization and the offset of EmptyBase will be 0 (it can be verified via clang -cc1 -x c++ -v -fdump-record-layouts main.cpp -emit-llvm -o /dev/null). When the analyzer tries to do zero initialization of EmptyBase it will hit the assert because that region has already been "written" by the constructor of NonEmptyBase. Test plan: make check-all Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D36851 Files: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp test/Analysis/ctor.mm Index: test/Analysis/ctor.mm =================================================================== --- test/Analysis/ctor.mm +++ test/Analysis/ctor.mm @@ -704,3 +704,20 @@ }; } } + +namespace NoCrashOnEmptyBaseOptimization { + struct NonEmptyBase { + int X; + explicit NonEmptyBase(int X) : X(X) {} + }; + + struct EmptyBase {}; + + struct S : NonEmptyBase, EmptyBase { + S() : NonEmptyBase(0), EmptyBase() {} + }; + + void testSCtorNoCrash() { + S s; + } +} Index: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp +++ lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp @@ -297,7 +297,17 @@ ExplodedNodeSet PreInitialized; { StmtNodeBuilder Bldr(DstPreVisit, PreInitialized, *currBldrCtx); - if (CE->requiresZeroInitialization()) { + // FIXME: The offsets of empty bases can be tricky because of + // of the so called "empty base class optimization". + // If a base class has been optimized out + // we should not try to create a binding, otherwise we should. + // Unfortunately, at the moment ASTRecordLayout doesn't expose + // the actual sizes of the empty bases + // and trying to infer this from offsets/alignments + // seems to be error-prone and tricky because of the trailing padding. + // As a temporary mitigation we don't create a binding for empty bases. + if (CE->requiresZeroInitialization() && + !CE->getConstructor()->getParent()->isEmpty()) { // Type of the zero doesn't matter. SVal ZeroVal = svalBuilder.makeZeroVal(getContext().CharTy);
Index: test/Analysis/ctor.mm =================================================================== --- test/Analysis/ctor.mm +++ test/Analysis/ctor.mm @@ -704,3 +704,20 @@ }; } } + +namespace NoCrashOnEmptyBaseOptimization { + struct NonEmptyBase { + int X; + explicit NonEmptyBase(int X) : X(X) {} + }; + + struct EmptyBase {}; + + struct S : NonEmptyBase, EmptyBase { + S() : NonEmptyBase(0), EmptyBase() {} + }; + + void testSCtorNoCrash() { + S s; + } +} Index: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp +++ lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp @@ -297,7 +297,17 @@ ExplodedNodeSet PreInitialized; { StmtNodeBuilder Bldr(DstPreVisit, PreInitialized, *currBldrCtx); - if (CE->requiresZeroInitialization()) { + // FIXME: The offsets of empty bases can be tricky because of + // of the so called "empty base class optimization". + // If a base class has been optimized out + // we should not try to create a binding, otherwise we should. + // Unfortunately, at the moment ASTRecordLayout doesn't expose + // the actual sizes of the empty bases + // and trying to infer this from offsets/alignments + // seems to be error-prone and tricky because of the trailing padding. + // As a temporary mitigation we don't create a binding for empty bases. + if (CE->requiresZeroInitialization() && + !CE->getConstructor()->getParent()->isEmpty()) { // Type of the zero doesn't matter. SVal ZeroVal = svalBuilder.makeZeroVal(getContext().CharTy);
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits