nemanjai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36764#843778, @saugustine wrote:
> Anyone have any opinions on this? I don't see an issue with providing these functions on PowerPC as there doesn't seem to be anything in the implementation that PowerPC would have an issue with. However, I'm not sure if there are precision specifications for these builtins. If so, it is quite possible that PowerPC's `long double` won't meet those specifications. For the time being, the PPC `long double` is not IEEE 754 compliant - it's a pair of doubles. https://reviews.llvm.org/D36764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
