haowei added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MagentaHandleChecker.cpp:483-498 +void MagentaHandleChecker::checkPreStmt(const ReturnStmt *RS, + CheckerContext &Ctx) const { + ProgramStateRef State = Ctx.getState(); + const StackFrameContext *SFCtx = Ctx.getStackFrame(); + if (!SFCtx || !SFCtx->inTopFrame()) + return; + const FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast_or_null<FunctionDecl>(SFCtx->getDecl()); ---------------- NoQ wrote: > xazax.hun wrote: > > NoQ wrote: > > > I think the analyzer core should do this. This code already has a global > > > effect on the analysis - it's enough for one checker to generate the > > > sink. Additionally, there's also the CFG-based variant of > > > suppress-on-sink, which would need to be extended to support this as well > > > - this other variant kicks in when the analysis was interrupted before > > > reaching the sink (see D35673 and D35674). > > Do we want to do this unconditionally? Are all of the resources cleaned up > > on all of the supported OSes, or maybe for some leak issues it still makes > > sense to warn in these cases? Or we simply favor false negatives over false > > positives in this case (might make sense)? > We could add a flag to `setSuppressOnSink()` as an orthogonal change if it > turns out that we need it; i'm not aware of any stuff that badly needs to be > cleaned up before normal program termination in the existing checkers. I also think this should be done in a separate checker like NoReturnFunctionChecker or within the analyzer as some other resource leak checkers might need this. I am also thinking D36475 should be in a separate checker as well. That annotation support really helps us a lot in analyzing unit test code and it might be useful for others if someone run into similar situation like us. But I cannot decide if we should use the annotate attribute or define a new attribute just for the analyzer. https://reviews.llvm.org/D36251 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits