llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> The current interpreter does _not_ evaluate function calls when checking for a potential constant expression. However, it _does_ evaluate the initializers of constructors. In the bytecode interpreter, this is harder because we compile the initializers and the body of a constructor all in the same function. Add a special opcode that we emit after the constructor initializers and that aborts when we're checking for a potential constant expression. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177384.diff 5 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+6-1) - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.cpp (+5-6) - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Interp.h (+10) - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Opcodes.td (+2) - (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/functions.cpp (+24) ``````````diff The server is unavailable at this time. Please wait a few minutes before you try again. `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177384 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
