gtbercea added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29654#835507, @arphaman wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29654#835501, @gtbercea wrote: > > > Is that the last access to CachedResults before the error? > > > Is the assertion the last access? Yes. > > There must be a discrepancy between > > `UI.DependentBoundArch` in the loop above and `BoundArch` that's used to > compute `TargetTC`, otherwise `GetTriplePlusArchString` would return the key > that matches the `0x0000000111c017d0` pointer, i.e. without the additional > x86_64. Maybe I misunderstood the output you pasted but it looks like ActionTC contains the same triple+arch that you can find in entry [1] in the map. https://reviews.llvm.org/D29654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
