mprobst marked an inline comment as done.
mprobst added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp:544-545
+ while (BackslashPos != StringRef::npos) {
+ if (BackslashPos + 1 < FormatTok->TokenText.size() &&
+ FormatTok->TokenText[BackslashPos + 1] == '\n') {
+ const char *Offset = Lex->getBufferLocation();
----------------
klimek wrote:
> Just wondering whether the \n can be in the next token. Probably not, though,
> the way we set up the lexer.
AFAIU (and experimentation confirms) LLVM always lexes the `\n` as separate
whitespace from the `// ...` line comment, but for backslash escaped line
endings after the `\\` the `\n` is inside of it - after all it's part of the
one comment token that continues on the next line.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36159
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
