ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > The fact that it landed twice already could also be interpreted as having > already flushed out most potential issues. And if it's still turns out to be > a major problem, it's still possible to revert during the RC phase (but the > opposite is not true, i.e. landing it during that time)
I don't think the feature is so important. It has been reverted twice doesn't mean it is stable now. It shouldn't matter to land it later. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/173789 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
