kcc added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36324#832271, @thakis wrote:
> Why should this be part of llvm? This seems to come with very heavy > dependencies (protobuf), and LLVM has historically tried to minimize the > number of things it depends on. This fuzzer has already uncovered a few llvm bugs, so I hope it can be useful directly. But more than that, I hope that a ready-to-use integration with structure-aware fuzzing will allow other researchers to experiment. Having it as a side patch (bit-rotten in a few weeks after creation) will discourage most of the potential researchers from experiments. I agree we don't want to bring heavy deps to LLVM, but this patch (AFAICT) doesn't bring any new deps to the default build. (at least this is the intent) https://reviews.llvm.org/D36324 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
