JonasToth added a comment. would be a classification of checks in general interesting?
i could think of "quality", some checks might be heuristic, some might be new and have some bugs, and some might catch everything correct and handle it perfectly. So checks could have 2 categories: -> autofixing/warning -> always correct/heuristic/unsure This would maybe improve acceptance, since you know what you get. If you are not interested in toying around, just activate the "always correct" stuff, and you wont accidentially break your code. https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
