Quuxplusone accepted this revision. Quuxplusone added a comment. > But if I'm overseeing reasons to issue a warning in this case, we could add > an analogue of `-Wshadow-uncaptured-local` for this case. WDYT?
I still think "any warning" is a marginally better UX than "no warning" on the particular code in question; but of course I defer to Reid/Richard/GCC on the practicalities. Adding a new warning option might not be worth the trouble. :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D35941 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
