github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp --
clang/lib/Analysis/UnsafeBufferUsage.cpp
clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsafe-buffer-usage.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/UnsafeBufferUsage.cpp
b/clang/lib/Analysis/UnsafeBufferUsage.cpp
index 23798becf..99c7a4417 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Analysis/UnsafeBufferUsage.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/UnsafeBufferUsage.cpp
@@ -4460,7 +4460,8 @@ void clang::checkUnsafeBufferUsage(const Decl *D,
if (const auto *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D)) {
// Consteval functions are free of UB by the spec, so we don't need to
// visit them or produce diagnostics.
- if (FD->isConsteval()) return;
+ if (FD->isConsteval())
+ return;
// We do not want to visit a Lambda expression defined inside a method
// independently. Instead, it should be visited along with the outer
method.
// FIXME: do we want to do the same thing for `BlockDecl`s?
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/171503
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
