boomanaiden154 wrote: > Is this with LTO? I think we have poor to nonexistent coverage of library > info in some of the LTO configurations
No, it wasn't with LTO. Turns out the issue was that the tooling was using a custom pass pipeline and wasn't running the new pass, so all the libcalls were marked as unsupported. Sorry for the noise here. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168622 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
