hans added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33900#819237, @dim wrote:
> Also note that it is only added to the `--version` output, not the `-v` > output (the former is really a "verbose" version of the latter): Which seems to be the opposite of what gcc does (`gcc -v` is more verbose than `gcc --version`.) $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20140318 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/google/work/gcc482prefix/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/work/gcc482prefix --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-checking=release Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20140318 (experimental) (GCC) In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33900#818968, @mehdi_amini wrote: > I think @thakis is right: this too verbose to be the default --version. > We likely shouldn't ship this in clang-5.0 (@hans). Let me know if you figure out a solution here and I'll merge it. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33900 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
