omern1 wrote: > > We don't want to do this for LTO; the linker is better positioned to > > generate crash diagnostics in that case. > > I'd like some response to this, at least.
Ah I misunderstood your comment. As things stand, if a link job crashes we never reach the point where we start constructing the list of inputs: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e766981ba1d035e060756d84a121c7c66647c3a4/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp#L2048 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165572 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
