================
@@ -1939,6 +1939,43 @@ TypeTraitExpr *TypeTraitExpr::CreateDeserialized(const
ASTContext &C,
return new (Mem) TypeTraitExpr(EmptyShell(), IsStoredAsBool);
}
+CXXReflectExpr::CXXReflectExpr(const ASTContext &C, QualType T, QualType Ty)
+ : Expr(CXXReflectExprClass, T, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary) {}
+
+CXXReflectExpr::CXXReflectExpr(const ASTContext &C, QualType T, Decl *Arg,
+ bool IsNamespace)
+ : Expr(CXXReflectExprClass, T, VK_PRValue, OK_Ordinary) {}
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
Hmm, the main thing I’m worried about is that the persisting part might get a
bit complicated: it’s one thing if it’s at the top-level, but if you have some
deeply nested struct that has a reflexion member, you’d have to rebuild (or at
least traverse) the entire `APValue`—and you’d have to either do that in any
case or come up w/ some system to keep track of whether this traversal to
potentially rebuild the `APValue` is necessary for the result of any particular
constant evaluation, which is yet more work that we’d have to do... so
considering all that I’m more leaning towards just persisting any nested
`APValue`s unconditionally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164692
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
