Author: marshall
Date: Sun Jun 25 21:25:15 2017
New Revision: 306269

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=306269&view=rev
Log:
Updated for the Toronto meeting

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=306269&r1=306268&r2=306269&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Sun Jun 25 21:25:15 2017
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
   <!--*********************************************************************-->
 
   <p>This is a temporary page; please check the c++1z status <a 
href="http://libcxx.llvm.org/cxx1z_status.html";>here</a></p>
-  <p>This page shows the status of the papers and issues that are expected to 
be adopted in Issaquah.</p>
+  <p>This page shows the status of the papers and issues that are expected to 
be adopted in Toronto.</p>
 
   <p>The groups that have contributed papers:
   <ul>
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
     <li>SG1 - Study group #1 (Concurrency working group)</li>
   </ul>
   </p>
-  
+
   <h3>Paper Status</h3>
   <table id="papers" border="1">
        <tr><th>Paper #</th><th>Group</th><th>Paper 
Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th><th>First released version</th></tr>
@@ -59,71 +59,41 @@
   <table id="issues" border="1">
        <tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue 
Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
 
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2260";>2260</a></td><td>Missing 
requirement for Allocator::pointer</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2768";>2768</a></td><td>any_cast 
and move semantics</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769";>2769</a></td><td>Redundant 
const in the return type of any_cast(const 
any&amp;)</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2781";>2781</a></td><td>Contradictory requirements for 
std::function and std::reference_wrapper</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2782";>2782</a></td><td>scoped_allocator_adaptor 
constructors must be constrained</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2784";>2784</a></td><td>Resolution 
to LWG 2484 is missing "otherwise, no effects" and is hard to 
parse</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2785";>2785</a></td><td>quoted 
should work with basic_string_view</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this 
already</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2786";>2786</a></td><td>Annex C 
should mention shared_ptr changes for array 
support</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2787";>2787</a></td><td>&sect;[file_status.cons] 
doesn't match class definition</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2789";>2789</a></td><td>Equivalence 
of contained objects</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2794";>2794</a></td><td>Missing 
requirements for allocator pointers</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2795";>2795</a></td><td>&sect;[global.functions] 
provides incorrect example of ADL use</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to 
do</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2804";>2804</a></td><td>Unconditional constexpr 
default constructor for istream_iterator</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this 
already</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2812";>2812</a></td><td>Range 
access is available with &lt;string_view&gt;</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this 
already</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2824";>2824</a></td><td>list::sort 
should say that the order of elements is unspecified if an exception is 
thrown</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2826";>2826</a></td><td>string_view 
iterators use old wording</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2834";>2834</a></td><td>Resolution 
LWG 2223 is missing wording about end iterators</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing 
to do</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2835";>2835</a></td><td>LWG 2536 
seems to misspecify &lt;tgmath.h&gt;</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2837";>2837</a></td><td>gcd and lcm 
should support a wider range of input values</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this 
already</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2838";>2838</a></td><td>is_literal_type specification 
needs a little cleanup</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2842";>2842</a></td><td>in_place_t 
check for optional::optional(U&amp;&amp;) should decay 
U</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2850";>2850</a></td><td>std::function move constructor 
does unnecessary work</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2853";>2853</a></td><td>Possible 
inconsistency in specification of erase in 
[vector.modifiers]</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2855";>2855</a></td><td>std::throw_with_nested("string_literal")</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2444";>2444</a></td><td>Inconsistent complexity for 
std::sort_heap</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2593";>2593</a></td><td>Moved-from 
state of Allocators</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2597";>2597</a></td><td>std::log 
misspecified for complex numbers</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2783";>2783</a></td><td>stack::emplace() and 
queue::emplace() should return decltype(auto)</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2932";>2932</a></td><td>Constraints 
on parallel algorithm implementations are 
underspecified</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2937";>2937</a></td><td>Is 
equivalent("existing_thing", "not_existing_thing") an 
error?</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2940";>2940</a></td><td>result_of 
specification also needs a little cleanup</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2942";>2942</a></td><td>LWG 2873's 
resolution missed weak_ptr::owner_before</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2954";>2954</a></td><td>Specialization of the 
convenience variable templates should be 
prohibited</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2961";>2961</a></td><td>Bad 
postcondition for set_default_resource</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2966";>2966</a></td><td>Incomplete 
resolution of US 74</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
+       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2974";>2974</a></td><td>Diagnose 
out of bounds 
tuple_element/variant_alternative</td><td>Toronto</td><td></td></tr>
 
        <tr><td></td><td><center><b>Priority 1 
Bugs</b></center></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
        <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2665";>2665</a></td><td>remove_filename() post 
condition is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td>We do this already</td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2806";>2806</a></td><td>Base class 
of bad_optional_access</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
-       <tr><td><a 
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2857";>2857</a></td><td>{variant,optional,any}::emplace
 should return the constructed value</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
 
   </table>
 
 <h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
 <ul>
-<li>2260 - Check our current allocators to make sure we do this</li>
-<li>2768 - Resolution is "apply 2769"</li>
-<li>2769 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li>
-<li>2781 - </li>
-<li>2782 - Looks straightforward.</li>
-<li>2784 - Patch Ready</li>
-<li>2785 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2786 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2787 - Eric? </li>
-<li>2789 - I don't think there are any code changes required here</li>
-<li>2794 - I don't think there are any code changes required here - maybe a 
static_assert.</li>
-<li>2795 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2804 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2812 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2824 - Nothing do to here, but we should add some throwing sort tests.</li>
-<li>2826 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2834 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2835 - I'm pretty sure we already do this.</li>
-<li>2837 - Added some tests to ensure we do this already.</li>
-<li>2838 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
-<li>2842 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li>
-<li>2850 - I think we already do this.</li>
-<li>2853 - I think that this will be mostly adding tests.</li>
-<li>2855 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li></li>
-<li></li>
-<li>2665 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2806 - We do this already.</li>
-<li>2857 - This is the subject of several NB comments.</li>
+<li>2444 - </li>
+<li>2593 - </li>
+<li>2597 - I think we do this already; probably needs tests</li>
+<li>2783 - should be easy to change; needs tests</li>
+<li>2932 - We're not doing the parallel algorithms yet.</li>
+<li>2937 - file system; Eric?</li>
+<li>2940 - We haven't implemented result_of yet, but I don't think that this 
will require any changes.</li>
+<li>2942 - all of our owner_before overloads are already noexcept; just need 
to update the tests.</li>
+<li>2954 - I don't think there's anything to do here.</li>
+<li>2961 - We haven't implemented the PMR stuff yet.</li>
+<li>2966 - Wording cleanup; no code or test changes needed.</li>
+<li>2974 - I have some code lying around that does this.</li>
 </ul>
 
-<p>Last Updated: 7-Feb-2017</p>
+<p>Last Updated: 25-Jun-2017</p>
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to