dexonsmith added a comment. > I followed the other availability macros in using "strict", but I'm not sure > this was the right decision. The documentation seems to recommend not using > "strict" (it says that weakly-linking is almost always a better API choice).
libc++ is one of the exceptions. Use `strict`. https://reviews.llvm.org/D34556 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
