================ @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +// RUN: %flang -### -S %s -g -gdwarf-5 2>&1 \ +// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-WITH-G-DWARF5 %s +// RUN: %flang -### -S %s -g1 -gdwarf-5 2>&1 \ +// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-WITH-G1-DWARF5 %s +// RUN: %flang -### -S %s -gdwarf-5 2>&1 \ +// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-WITHOUT-G-DWARF5 %s ---------------- tarunprabhu wrote:
Perhaps both `CHECK-WITH-G-DWARF5` and `CHECK-WITHOUT-G-DWARF5` could be replaced with a single `CHECK-DWARF5`. By swapping the tests, it becomes more obvious that in one case, `-g` is provided, while in the other, it is not. Since the check prefix now has the same name, it is clear that the expected behavior is the same. For instance: ```suggestion // RUN: %flang -### -S %s -g -gdwarf-5 2>&1 \ // RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-DWARF5 %s // RUN: %flang -### -S %s -gdwarf-5 2>&1 \ // RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-DWARF5 %s // RUN: %flang -### -S %s -g1 -gdwarf-5 2>&1 \ // RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-WITH-G1-DWARF5 %s ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158314 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
