There's plenty of precedent for supporting a name we like for a flag, and also supporting an alias for GCC compatibility (especially for warning flags).
On 21 June 2017 at 10:56, Raphael Isemann via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > teemperor added a comment. > > @ahatanak I think we can leave the more expressive clang name for this > warning and just add the bit cryptic GCC name for compability. But I don't > have a strong opinion on this. > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D34439 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
