rjmccall added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:4128
+ return true;
+ }
+
----------------
puneetha wrote:
> rjmccall wrote:
> > I don't understand the difference you're creating between traits here.
> > Three specific traits about destructibility allow incomplete array types
> > regardless of whether the base type is incomplete, but the rest do not?
> >
> > Anyway, I think what you want here is basically just:
> >
> > if (auto ArrayTy = S.Context.getAsIncompleteArrayType(ArgTy)) {
> > ArgTy = ArrayTy->getElementType();
> > }
> Of my understanding, these traits are defined by MSVC. There is no mention of
> them in the GCC type-traits documentation. For these traits, GCC lets us pass
> an array of incomplete bounds for any base type, complete or incomplete.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong.
I see. If we're matching GCC bug-for-bug, it doesn't really matter if the
behavior seems inconsistent.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34198
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
