yvvan added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34279#784089, @hans wrote:

> I have 19.00.24210, so slightly earlier I suppose, but I believe we use 
> Update 3 on our Chromium buildbots, and they seem happy.
>
> Can you paste the full error message? The part I see in your screenshot 
> doesn't really make sense. Why should converting 1 to unsigned int be a 
> narrowing conversion? I'm just trying to understand why we need this.


You can look at the file from screenshot and line numbers inside it - there's 
an implicit conversion from the enumeration TargetOpcode (which is signed int 
for my compiler without my change) to the unsigned int.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34279



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to