ilovepi wrote:

> Seems worth investigating adding support for `unset` in `lit`'s internal 
> shell given how much repetition it would save here, TBH.

IIRC in the initial work last year it was deliberately decided not to support 
`unset`, since ists somewhat complex w/ its interactions, and you can have 
similar behavior w/ `env -u` for the specific tests that need it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156904
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to