================ @@ -125,8 +125,11 @@ DEBUGOPT(DebugNameTable, 2, 0, Compatible) /// Whether to use DWARF base address specifiers in .debug_ranges. DEBUGOPT(DebugRangesBaseAddress, 1, 0, Compatible) +/// Whether to add linkage names to constructor/destructor declarations. +DEBUGOPT(DebugStructorDeclLinkageNames, 1, 0, Benign) ---------------- dwblaikie wrote:
Somewhere in the code (not sure if it's here, or at the usage, etc) we should probably say that this option is one of those awkward "workaround for a regression" but there's no real principled reason structor linkage names on decls should be handled differently from function linkage names on decls. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154142 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
