Dalmurii wrote:

> > @mtrofin I have tried writing an explanation by editing the PR's first 
> > comment. Could you verify if this would explain enough or is it not enough 
> > for some reason?
> 
> This helps! Some nits: if you look at other PRs in our repo, we don't do much 
> formatting, i.e. no need for lots of headers and all that. If I may: you 
> could, for example, summarize all of it as `Indirect linking of llvm as a 
> shared library is causing a "free() invalid size abortion". In my case, my 
> project depends on google/clspv which in turn pulls llvm. Note that the issue 
> does not occur when clspv is statically linked`. <- I'm assuming that is the 
> library you're talking about in `When library is all statically linked, this 
> problem did not occur.`
> 
> I'd also use this context in the referenced issue (so it can be stand-alone 
> readable)

I would add brief section and write you've written for me. My appreciation for 
great suggestion.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154541
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to