Xazax-hun wrote: > The RAV would still need to maintain a Visited set
Could you elaborate on why? > WDYT about this alternative of using a RAV driver ? Hmm, there is a change that this could be a bit simpler than the current solution. If you can give this a try to see where does that lead it would be awesome. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153661 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
