llvm-ci wrote:

LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder 
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while 
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".

Full details are available at: 
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/32827

<details>
<summary>Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference</summary>

```
Step 6 (test-build-unified-tree-check-all) failure: test (failure)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: Sema/attr-cfi-salt.c' FAILED 
********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/clang 
-cc1 -internal-isystem 
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/build/lib/clang/22/include
 -nostdsysteminc -fsyntax-only -fsanitize=kcfi -verify 
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/attr-cfi-salt.c
 # RUN: at line 1
+ 
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/clang 
-cc1 -internal-isystem 
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/build/lib/clang/22/include
 -nostdsysteminc -fsyntax-only -fsanitize=kcfi -verify 
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/attr-cfi-salt.c
error: 'expected-warning' diagnostics seen but not expected: 
  File 
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/attr-cfi-salt.c
 Line 16: redefinition of typedef 'bar_t' is a C11 feature
error: 'expected-note' diagnostics seen but not expected: 
  File 
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/attr-cfi-salt.c
 Line 15: previous definition is here
2 errors generated.

--

********************


```

</details>

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141846
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to