chh added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34002#775830, @alexfh wrote:
> IIUC, when `vector<T>` (for a class `T` that has both move and copy > constructors) resizes, it will prefer move constructors, but only if they're > declared `noexcept`. This is true even if `-fno-exceptions` is on. So I > don't think this check should depend on `-fno-exceptions`. Should the compiler assume `noexcept` when -fno-exceptions is on? That means move constructors should be preferred under -fno-exceptions, and this check would be unnecessary, right? https://reviews.llvm.org/D34002 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
