moorabbit wrote: > If we have `__has_feature(cfi)` mean CFI || KCFI that is sort of going in the > opposite direction
Yes. IMHO, it's a good idea to have a dedicated `__has_feature` for "regular" `CFI`, similar to what we have for `KCFI`. Merging "regular" `CFI` and `KCFI` support under a single `__has_feature(cfi)` can be awkward, since it doesn’t definitively indicate support for regular `CFI`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151348 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
