ruiu added a comment. I'm totally against adding per-OS path knowledge to our linker. Compilers already know include paths and I don't want to maintain another list of paths in the linker. Also this can be more confusing than useful when you are doing cross-linking.
For all OSes other than NetBSD, LLD works fine with the clang driver as the driver passes include paths to the linker. I don't see any reason not to do the same thing for NetBSD. That stands even if the linker has to have a list of include paths. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D33726 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
