jgorbe added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp:3792-3793
static void checkCorrectionVisibility(Sema &SemaRef, TypoCorrection &TC) {
if (TC.begin() == TC.end())
return;
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> jgorbe wrote:
> > rsmith wrote:
> > > Do we need to clear the flag on this path too? (This might happen if the
> > > old correction required an import and after clearing we set this up as a
> > > keyword correction.)
> > If this might happen, then yes. I have updated the patch to clear the flag
> > here as well but, on second thought, is this path necessary at all? It
> > seems to me that 'no declarations' is a special case of 'all declarations
> > are visible', which we check right after this.
> I agree, this check is redundant. Just go ahead and remove it :)
Done! :D
I don't have commit access yet, can you please commit it?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30963
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
