================
@@ -19,14 +19,35 @@
#define LLVM_CLANG_ANALYSIS_ANALYSES_LIFETIMESAFETY_H
#include "clang/Analysis/AnalysisDeclContext.h"
#include "clang/Analysis/CFG.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMapInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/ImmutableMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/ImmutableSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/StringMap.h"
#include <memory>
namespace clang::lifetimes {
+/// Enum to track the confidence level of a potential error.
+enum class Confidence {
+ None,
+ Maybe, // Reported as a potential error (-Wlifetime-safety-strict)
+ Definite // Reported as a definite error (-Wlifetime-safety-permissive)
+};
+
+class LifetimeSafetyReporter {
----------------
Xazax-hun wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion here but a potential alternative is to just use
the regular diagnostics interface of Sema directly and if we want to do testing
we can use a different diagnostic consumer like `TextDiagnosticBuffer` or
`IgnoringDiagConsumer`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149731
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
