alexfh added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33304#771215, @hokein wrote:
> Thanks for the contributions. > > All your three checks are not android specific -- because they are checking > POSIX APIs (`open`, `creat`, `fopen`), which are more likely related to > POSIX. So personally, I'm +1 on a "posix" module, instead of "android", but > wait to see other reviewers' opinions before renaming it. IIUC, these checks enforce a certain - Android-specific - way of using POSIX APIs. I'm not sure if the recommendations are universally useful. Or am I mistaken? https://reviews.llvm.org/D33304 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
