frobtech wrote: > Actually, thinking about it, maybe we should just do the nop insertion for > UEFI targets. The UEFI environment is very similar to Windows. CC @Prabhuk .
I think that's an appropriately conservative place to start, anyway. The uefi-* targets are still nascent and heretofore the Windows targets have been used for producing UEFI binaries. So the approach we've taken is that for all miscellaneous code generation issues, we should start with the UEFI target matching the behavior of the corresponding Windows target exactly. That seems like the right thing to do for now. In the future as the uefi-* targets mature, we can reconsider things that are really only relevant to Windows ABIs and not to the UEFI ABI or the PE-COFF format. The Windows EH ABI is not an aspect of the UEFI ABI, but the support for Windows EH does not interfere with UEFI so I think it's harmless enough to emit all the same stuff. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144745 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
