================
@@ -1233,3 +1233,34 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitAttributedStmt(const
AttributedStmt *A,
getCheckerManager().runCheckersForPostStmt(Dst, EvalSet, A, *this);
}
+
+void ExprEngine::VisitCXXParenListInitExpr(const CXXParenListInitExpr *E,
+ ExplodedNode *Pred,
+ ExplodedNodeSet &Dst) {
----------------
a-tarasyuk wrote:
Although feasible, the inconsistent handling of argument lists and compound
types adds unnecessary complexity. It’s still worth considering as a future
improvement. Probably would be better to keep it out of this issue to avoid
extra changes. @steakhal @necto WDYT?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148988
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
