usx95 wrote: > One question for the future: sometimes it might be better to run certain > analyses side by side in the same worklist rather than running them > sequentially after each other. Do you think there are some analysis steps > that will be beneficial to be combined in that way?
That is true to a certain extent. The analyses with similar # of fixed-point-iterations can be grouped together to run together to save on multiple fixed-point iterations. At this point, I expect the LoanPropagation to significantly outweigh the rest of analyses to have any meaningful wins from a single worklist. As you said, this can be addressed in the future when we have some evidence through profiling and benchmarking on real code bases. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148222 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
