beanz added a comment. Is this really something we should be supporting? Building and testing clang with potentially out-of-sync lit or gtest seems undesirable to me.
It is worth noting that we do have mods to gtest, so supporting any standard distribution of it seems like a not great idea. The general approach in the past for standalone builds has been to disable testing unless an LLVM source tree is available, and I think that might be the right approach. Also, this all kinda becomes moot if LLVM moves to a mono-repo (really not trying to troll here), because people actively developing LLVM projects will basically be forced to have LLVM source trees anyways. Thoughts? https://reviews.llvm.org/D32595 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
