llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format

Author: None (sstwcw)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

When reviewing #<!-- -->147156, the reviewers pointed out that we didn't need 
to support the trigraph.  The code never handled it right.

In the debug build, this kind of input caused the assertion in the function 
`countLeadingWhitespace` to fail.  The release build without assertions 
outputted `?` `?` `/` separated by spaces.

```C
#define A ??/
  int i;
```

This is because the code in `countLeadingWhitespace` assumed that the 
underlying lexer recognized the entire `??/` sequence as a single token. In 
fact, the lexer recognized it as 3 separate tokens.  The flag to make the lexer 
recognize trigraphs was never enabled.

This patch enables the flag in the underlying lexer.  This way, the program now 
either turns the trigraph into a single `\` or removes it altogether if the 
line is short enough.  There are operators like the `??=` in C#.  So the flag 
is not enabled for all input languages. Instead the check for the token size is 
moved from the assert line into the if line.

The problem was introduced by my own patch 370bee480139 from about 3 years ago. 
 I added code to count the number of characters in the escape sequence probably 
just because the block of code used to have a comment saying someone should add 
the feature.  Maybe I forgot to enable assertions when I ran the code.  I found 
the problem because reviewing pull request 145243 made me look at the code 
again.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148640.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp (+11-24) 
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp (+11) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp 
b/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp
index 49da3160daf50..ea51f88f2d975 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::truncateToken(size_t NewLen) {
 /// Count the length of leading whitespace in a token.
 static size_t countLeadingWhitespace(StringRef Text) {
   // Basically counting the length matched by this regex.
-  // "^([\n\r\f\v \t]|(\\\\|\\?\\?/)[\n\r])+"
+  // "^([\n\r\f\v \t]|\\\\[\n\r])+"
   // Directly using the regex turned out to be slow. With the regex
   // version formatting all files in this directory took about 1.25
   // seconds. This version took about 0.5 seconds.
@@ -1222,13 +1222,6 @@ static size_t countLeadingWhitespace(StringRef Text) {
         break;
       // Splice found, consume it.
       Cur = Lookahead + 1;
-    } else if (Cur[0] == '?' && Cur[1] == '?' && Cur[2] == '/' &&
-               (Cur[3] == '\n' || Cur[3] == '\r')) {
-      // Newlines can also be escaped by a '?' '?' '/' trigraph. By the way, 
the
-      // characters are quoted individually in this comment because if we write
-      // them together some compilers warn that we have a trigraph in the code.
-      assert(End - Cur >= 4);
-      Cur += 4;
     } else {
       break;
     }
@@ -1300,22 +1293,16 @@ FormatToken *FormatTokenLexer::getNextToken() {
             Style.TabWidth - (Style.TabWidth ? Column % Style.TabWidth : 0);
         break;
       case '\\':
-      case '?':
-      case '/':
-        // The text was entirely whitespace when this loop was entered. Thus
-        // this has to be an escape sequence.
-        assert(Text.substr(i, 4) == "\?\?/\r" ||
-               Text.substr(i, 4) == "\?\?/\n" ||
-               (i >= 1 && (Text.substr(i - 1, 4) == "\?\?/\r" ||
-                           Text.substr(i - 1, 4) == "\?\?/\n")) ||
-               (i >= 2 && (Text.substr(i - 2, 4) == "\?\?/\r" ||
-                           Text.substr(i - 2, 4) == "\?\?/\n")) ||
-               (Text[i] == '\\' && [&]() -> bool {
-                 size_t j = i + 1;
-                 while (j < Text.size() && isHorizontalWhitespace(Text[j]))
-                   ++j;
-                 return j < Text.size() && (Text[j] == '\n' || Text[j] == 
'\r');
-               }()));
+        // The code preceding the loop and in the countLeadingWhitespace
+        // function guarantees that Text is entirely whitespace, not including
+        // comments but including escaped newlines. So if 1 of these characters
+        // show up, then it has to be in an escape sequence.
+        assert(Text[i] == '\\' && [&]() -> bool {
+          size_t j = i + 1;
+          while (j < Text.size() && isHorizontalWhitespace(Text[j]))
+            ++j;
+          return j < Text.size() && (Text[j] == '\n' || Text[j] == '\r');
+        }());
         InEscape = true;
         break;
       default:
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp 
b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
index 0bc1c6d45656e..46e55da5b5e11 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -6681,6 +6681,17 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, EscapedNewlines) {
                "  int x(int a);",
                AlignLeft);
 
+  // Escaped with a trigraph.  The program just has to avoid crashing.
+  verifyNoCrash("#define A \?\?/\n"
+                "int i;\?\?/\n"
+                "  int j;");
+  verifyNoCrash("#define A \?\?/\r\n"
+                "int i;\?\?/\r\n"
+                "  int j;");
+  verifyNoCrash("#define A \?\?/\n"
+                "int i;",
+                getGoogleStyle(FormatStyle::LK_CSharp));
+
   // CRLF line endings
   verifyFormat("#define A \\\r\n  int i;  \\\r\n  int j;",
                "#define A \\\r\nint i;\\\r\n  int j;", Narrow);

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148640
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to