rsmith added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29877#765968, @EricWF wrote:
> I think this patch still gets the following case wrong:
>
> // foo.h
> constexpr struct {
> template <class T> void operator()(T) {} // emits unused template warning
> } foo;
>
What specifically do you think is wrong here? There is an unused internal
linkage function template here. If we want to warn on unused internal linkage
templates declared in headers, we should warn on this one.
Note that any use of `foo` here from an inline function would result in ODR
violations (because you get a different `foo` in each translation unit), so
it's probably at least a bad idea to do that. We could suppress this warning
for unused internal linkage templates declared in headers, or maybe move that
to a separate warning flag; can you point us at some code that does this in
practice and isn't wrong?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29877
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
