krasimir added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clangd/ClangdUnitStore.h:56
+ template <class Func>
+ void runOnExistingUnit(PathRef File, Func Action) {
+ std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(Mutex);
----------------
krasimir wrote:
> Maybe make it less generic and put the implementation in the source file? It
> uses std::function anyways.
Sorry, I didn't see the surroundings. Disregard this comment.
================
Comment at: clangd/ClangdUnitStore.h:62
+
+ Action(It->second);
+ }
----------------
Why can't we use `runOnUnitImpl` here?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33415
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
